1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 991 F.2d
  5. 991 F.2d 751 (1993)
 

GOODWALL CONST. CO. v. BEERS CONST. CO.

No. 92-1338.

991 F.2d 751 (1993)

GOODWALL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Howard P. Gooden, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BEERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing Declined June 28, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ned L. Conley, Conley, Rose & Tayon, Houston, TX, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief was William E. Shull.

William H. Boice, Kilpatrick & Cody, of Atlanta, GA, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were John S. Pratt, Christopher P. Bussett and Dean W. Russell.

Before MAYER, RADER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined June 28, 1993.

RADER, Circuit Judge.

Goodwall Construction Company and Howard P. Gooden sued Beers Construction Company for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,149,513, "Method of Texturing Concrete with Deep Texture Hammer," reissued as U.S. Reissue Patent No. 32,292. A jury found that Beers willfully infringed claims one through five of the reissue patent.

The United States District Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases