1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 20 Cal.App.4th
  5. 20 Cal.App.4th 152 (1993)
 

FRIENDS OF H STREET v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO

Docket No. C013852.

20 Cal.App.4th 152 (1993)

24 Cal. Rptr.2d 607

FRIENDS OF H STREET et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant and Respondent; CHARLES O. GREENLAW et al., Interveners and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

October 21, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Adamo & Nevares and John B. Adamo for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Sharon Siedorf Cardenas, City Attorney, William P. Carnazzo, Assistant City Attorney, and Leslie R. Lopez, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

Charles O. Greenlaw and Charles E. Shoemaker, in pro. per., for Interveners and Respondents.

OPINION

NICHOLSON, J.

This is the second of two appeals challenging the manner in which the City of Sacramento (the City) maintains and manages H Street. In Hutchinson v. City of Sacramento (1993) 17 Cal.App.4th 791 [21 Cal.Rptr.2d 779], an appeal resulting from two property owners' successful petition for writ of mandate, we...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases