1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 621 So.2d
  5. 621 So.2d 1095 (1993)
 

EISNER v. HOCHSTADT

No. 92-1786.

621 So.2d 1095 (1993)

Michael EISNER, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. A.M. HOCHSTADT, Max Hochstadt, and Rose Hochstadt, Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

August 10, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douthit, Jung & Gross and Marc Anthony Douthit, Miami, for appellant/cross-appellee.

J. Steven Warner, Boca Raton, for appellees/cross-appellants.

Before NESBITT, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Eisner, defendant below, appeals a final judgment entered against him after a bench trial. Appellees A.M. Hochstadt, Max Hochstadt, and Rose Hochstadt, plaintiffs below, cross-appeal.

As to Eisner's appeal, we conclude that no reversible error has been shown on the record now before us in the trial court's denial of the motions to dismiss for lack of prosecution. Likewise no error is shown in the first point on cross-appeal, relating to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases