ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing after he pleaded guilty to two counts of sale of a controlled substance. We find the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(1) and (5).
We further find an opinion in this matter would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.