PROCTOR v. SAIF

90-04089; CA A70294.

860 P.2d 828 (1993)

123 Or. App. 326

In the Matter of the Compensation of Robert Proctor, Claimant. Robert PROCTOR, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and Adult And Family Services Division, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 22, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eileen G. Simpson, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Peter O. Hansen, Portland.

Michael Whitty, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, C.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


DURHAM, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order denying the compensability of his claim. The issues are whether he was a traveling employee and whether he was on a distinct departure on a personal errand at the time of injury. We review for errors of law, ORS 656.298(6); ORS 183.482(7), (8), and reverse and remand.

We take the facts from the Board's findings. Employer organized a conference in Corbett to teach its employees about...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases