SCHMIDT v. FORTNER

No. 92-0912.

629 So.2d 1036 (1993)

Susanne Rae SCHMIDT, as Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Karl F. Schmidt; Gene J. Schmidt, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Etha Mae Schmidt; and Susanne Rae Schmidt, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Karl F. Schmidt, Jr., Appellants, v. Lloyd B. FORTNER, individually; Bernard S. Schmidt, individually, as former Personal Representative of the Estate of Karl F. Schmidt, as former Personal Representative of the Estate of Etha Mae Schmidt, and as Trustee under the Will of Etha Mae Schmidt, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

December 29, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theresa A. DiPaola of Roberts & DiPaola, P.A. and Philip M. Burlington of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Cathy L. Kasten of Adams, Coogler, Watson & Merkel, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.


FARMER, Judge.

In this case, we review a trial court's decision to deny a motion for offer-of-judgment attorney's fees under sections 45.061 and 768.79, Florida Statutes (1991). We reverse.

Bernard Schmidt was appointed the personal representative [PR] of the estate of his uncle, Karl Sr., in 1978. The decedent's widow (his aunt), Etha Mae, was the other PR. She died in 1981, and Bernard was then appointed the sole PR of her estate.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases