U.S. v. JAMES

No. 92-10043.

987 F.2d 648 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Cornelius JAMES, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided March 8, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Frank McCabe, Goorjian & McCabe, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellant.

Rodolfo M. Orjales, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: ALARCON, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.


RYMER, Circuit Judge:

The government neglected to introduce evidence that banks it accused Charles Cornelius James of robbing were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Even though proof of FDIC insurance is an element of the federal crime of bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), James was convicted. He appeals on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence.1 We have to decide whether a stipulation about "the FDIC aspect...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases