1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 857 P.2d
  5. 857 P.2d 751 (1993)
 

STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. v. CRAMER

No. 22965.

857 P.2d 751 (1993)

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Ronald CRAMER, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

July 29, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pearson & Patton and Theodore J. Kurtz, Las Vegas, for appellant.

David Allen & Associates and James W. King, Las Vegas, for respondent.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The instant controversy requires us to determine whether NRS 689A.230(2) applies to a catastrophic medical expense rider issued by appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company to the respondent, Ronald Cramer. We conclude that it does not and reverse the entry of partial summary judgment in favor of Cramer and the denial of State Farm's motion for summary judgment.

FACTS

The facts are not disputed. On November...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases