U.S. v. HARTZOG

No. 92-5414.

983 F.2d 604 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David HARTZOG, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided January 12, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert James Wagner, Richmond, VA, argued for defendant-appellant.

Nicholas S. Altimari, U.S. Attorney's Office, Richmond, VA, argued (Richard Cullen, U.S. Atty., Stephen W. Miller, Asst. U.S. Atty., and James Reynolds, Third Year Law Student, on brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before RUSSELL and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.


OPINION

LUTTIG, Circuit Judge:

Defendant appellant Hartzog was convicted on five related firearms charges. On appeal, he challenges both his sentence and the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction under count five. Finding no error, we affirm.

I.

Three separate purchases of firearms are at issue in this appeal. On October 23, 1990, in Chesterfield County, Virginia, Wanda Bowman purchased three guns on behalf of Hartzog because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases