ARMSTRONG v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

Civ. A. No. 89-142 (CRR).

821 F.Supp. 761 (1993)

Scott ARMSTRONG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF The PRESIDENT, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

As Amended June 9, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Tankersley, Public Citizen Litigation Group, with David C. Vladeck, Public Citizen Litigation Group, Washington, DC were on the briefs, for plaintiffs.

David J. Anderson, Atty. U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Washington, DC, with whom Stuart E. Schiffer, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., J. Ramsey Johnson, U.S. Atty. for the District of Columbia, and Elizabeth A. Pugh, Jason R. Baron, Anthony J. Coppolino, Peter D. Coffman, and Pamela A. Moreau, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div. Washington, DC, were on the briefs, for defendants.


OPINION

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the Court are the Defendants' and the Plaintiffs' responses to this Court's Order of April 6, 1993, where this Court ordered the Defendants to show cause as to whether they should be held in civil contempt for their failure to comply with this Court's Orders of January 6 and 11, 1993. The Court held a hearing on this matter on May 17, 1993.

After careful...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases