1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 850 S.W.2d
  5. 850 S.W.2d 726 (1993)
 

PANKHURST v. WEITINGER & TUCKER

No. 13-92-143-CV.

850 S.W.2d 726 (1993)

Elizabeth PANKHURST, Appellant, v. WEITINGER & TUCKER, Gregg K. Saxe and Don B. Morgan, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi.

Rehearing Overruled April 1, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald P. DeNisco, Barbara E. Pusch, Houston, for appellant.

Daniel F. Shank, Davis & Shank, W. James Kronzer, Houston, for appellees.

Before NYE, C.J., and GILBERTO HINOJOSA and FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA, Jr., JJ.

OPINION

GILBERTO HINOJOSA, Justice.

Mrs. Elizabeth Pankhurst appeals the trial court's dismissal of her legal malpractice claim against Weitinger & Tucker, Don Morgan, and Gregg Saxe (together referred to as Weitinger & Tucker). The trial court dismissed the claim because she lacked standing to bring the action. Elizabeth Pankhurst urges that her cause of action for legal malpractice is viable. We agree and reverse and remand for further proceedings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases