INGRAM v. WIRT

No. 93-278.

869 S.W.2d 685 (1993)

314 Ark. 553

Roy and Norma Shirley INGRAM, Husband and Wife, and Kenneth and Kathy Ingram, Husband and Wife, Appellants, v. Sedric and Phyllis WIRT, Husband and Wife, and George and Trudy Henley, Husband and Wife, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

December 20, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hardin & Grace, Little Rock, for appellants.

Marian M. McMullan, Little Rock, for appellees.


SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION DENYING REHEARING.

HOLT, Chief Justice.

In their petition for rehearing, the Ingrams challenge our holding in Ingram v. Wirt, 314 Ark. 553, 864 S.W.2d 237 (1993), by enumerating four points of error in the opinion. We deny the petition but address the errors alleged in order to clarify our analysis.

The Ingrams' first two assignments of error...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases