REFINEMET INTERN. CO. v. EASTBOURNE N.V.

No. 88 Civ. 8527 (JES).

815 F.Supp. 738 (1993)

REFINEMET INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. EASTBOURNE N.V., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 10, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grutman Greene & Humphrey, New York City (Norman Roy Grutman, Jewel Humphrey and Donald Zimmerman, of counsel), C. William Yanuck, New York City, for plaintiff.

Winston & Strawn, New York City, for defendant; Edward N. Meyer and Suzanne R. Dyer, of counsel.


OPINION AND ORDER

SPRIZZO, District Judge.

Refinemet International Company ("Refinemet" or "plaintiff") brings this action for damages against Eastbourne N.V. ("Eastbourne" or "defendant") for breach of an indemnification agreement, and for a declaration of Eastbourne's future liability for continuing reimbursement of expenses paid or incurred by Refinemet. The Court having held a bench trial, having seen and heard the witnesses, having reviewed in detail...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases