1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 833 F.Supp.
  5. 833 F.Supp. 714 (1993)
 

LASLEY v. GODINEZ

No. 92 C 4444.

833 F.Supp. 714 (1993)

Willie LASLEY, Stephen Carter, Alex West, Bruce Davis, Terry Starks, Millard Alexander, Parson Lavance, Herbert Barnes, Rickey McGee, Timothy Ford, James Thomas, Markus Durden Bey, Jeffery Mahalick, Charles Spears, Michael Wells, Eddie Brown, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Salvador GODINEZ, Warden of Stateville Correctional Center, James Schomig, Ass't Warden of Stateville Correctional Center, Mark Nelson, Superintendent at Stateville Correctional Center, Ulesses Price, Captain at Stateville Correctional Center, John Thomas, Lieutenant at Stateville Correctional Center, William Pulley, c/o at Stateville Correctional Center, Paul Rainwater, c/o at Stateville Correctional Center, Officer Hicks, c/o at Stateville Correctional Center, Officer Shega, c/o at Stateville Correctional Center, Locksmith Drew, Locksmith at Stateville Correctional Center, John Doe # 1, John Doe # 2, John Doe # 3, John Doe # 4, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

September 24, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Willie Lasley, pro se.

Stephen Carter, pro se.

Alex West, pro se.

Bruce Davis, pro se.

Terry Starks, pro se.

Millard Alexander, pro se.

Parson Lavance, pro se.

Herbert Barnes, pro se.

Rickey McGee, pro se.

Timothy Ford, pro se.

James Thomas, pro se.

Markus Durden Bey, pro se.

Jeffery Mahalick, pro se.

Charles Spears, pro se.

Eddie Brown, pro se.

Michael Wells, pro se.

Marina Popovic, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gen. Law Div., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Plaintiffs, inmates at Stateville Correctional Center, bring this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against ten correctional officials at Stateville. Plaintiffs allege that their due process rights have been violated because they have been found guilty at Adjustment Committee hearings without any evidence to support the finding, that defendants have failed to follow procedures of the Illinois...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases