1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 13 Cal.App.4th
  5. 13 Cal.App.4th 141 (1993)
 

SAVE STANISLAUS AREA FARM v. BD. OF SUPERVISORS

Docket No. F018332.

13 Cal.App.4th 141 (1993)

16 Cal. Rptr.2d 408

SAVE STANISLAUS AREA FARM ECONOMY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS et al., Defendants and Respondents; FAMILY FARM ALLIANCE et al., Real Parties in Interest and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

February 11, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Neumiller & Beardslee, Steven A. Herum, Thomas H. Terpstra and George A. Petrulakis for Real Parties in Interest and Appellants.

Brunn & Flynn, Charles K. Brunn, Gerald Brunn, Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger, Rachel B. Hooper, Christy H. Taylor and Richard S. Taylor for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Michael H. Krausnick, County Counsel, and E. Vernon Seeley, Assistant County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

VARTABEDIAN, J.

This is an appeal from the trial court's judgment directing the Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors (Board) to place on the 1992 general election ballot a slow-growth ordinance known as Measure F. Respondents on appeal, Save Stanislaus Area Farm Economy and certain named individuals (SAFE), filed a petition for writ of mandate in the trial court. The Board was respondent in that proceeding; Family Farm Alliance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases