HICKS v. DUNN

1920313.

622 So.2d 914 (1993)

Kenneth K. HICKS, v. Cherry DUNN.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 18, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark A. Scogin of Espy, Nettles and Scogin, P.C., Tuscaloosa, for appellant.

Charles M. Coleman and Ralph L. Dill of Crownover, Coleman & Standridge, Tuscaloosa, for appellee.


SHORES, Justice.

Kenneth Hicks appeals from a summary judgment denying his claim against Cherry Dunn for specific performance of a contract for the sale of land. We affirm.

Hicks was an assignee to the rights of Kayo Booth and James T. Booth under a contract to purchase land from Cherry Dunn Hulsey and her husband, Malcolm Hulsey. The Booths had entered a contract with the Hulseys dated October 4, 1989, to purchase Lot 13 of the Lake Sherwood subdivision in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases