BARTON v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

No. 92-3630.

985 F.2d 547 (1993)

William I. BARTON, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 5, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary L. Jennings, Acting Gen. Counsel, David C. Kane, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Stephanie M. Conley, Atty., Merit Systems Protection Bd., of Washington, DC, were on the motion to reform caption and to extend time.

Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Hillary A. Stern, Atty., Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, of Washington, DC, were on the opposition to the Merit Systems Protection Board's motion to reform the caption.

Paul P. Vangellow, Falls Church, VA, was on the opposition to the Merit Systems Protection Board's motion to reform the caption.

Before PLAGER, Circuit Judge.


ON MOTION

ORDER

The Merit Systems Protection Board moves to reform the caption to have the Board designated as respondent. The Department of Justice, the present respondent, opposes. William I. Barton opposes.

This matter stems from Barton's individual right of action (IRA) proceeding before the Board alleging that the Drug Enforcement Administration suspended him for three days in reprisal for whistle-blowing activities. In the Administrative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases