1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 14 Cal.App.4th
  5. 14 Cal.App.4th 1515 (1993)
 

LEE v. CITY OF LOMPOC

Docket No. B066615.

14 Cal.App.4th 1515 (1993)

18 Cal. Rptr.2d 389

STEVEN C. LEE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF LOMPOC et al., Defendants and Respondents; DIVERSIFIED SHOPPING CENTER, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

April 15, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Davis, Cowell & Bowe, Steven L. Stemerman and Marjorie M. Alvord for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

David H. Hirsch, City Attorney, and Sharon D. Stuart, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.

Rutan & Tucker, Michael D. Rubin and S. Daniel Harbottle as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.

Stradling, Yocca, Carlson & Rauth, E. Kurt Yeager, Ronald A. Van Blarcom and David H. Mann for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

OPINION

STONE (S.J.), P.J.

Does the California Environmental Quality Act apply to a city council's decision to call for a special election to have the electorate decide whether to amend a general plan and zoning ordinance? We hold it does not.

Steven C. Lee and Anthony Marvin Armas appeal from a judgment denying issuance of a writ of mandate. They brought this action to challenge the adequacy of environmental review for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases