NAGLE v. ALSPACH

No. 92-1950.

8 F.3d 141 (1993)

Mary NAGLE; James A. Shertzer; S. Enola Gochenauer; Alan Shaffer; Eugene C. Adams; George F. Wilt; Michael E. Wilt; Daniel H. Shertzer and James A. Shertzer and Daniel H. Shertzer, Executors under the Will of Elva A. Shertzer, Deceased, v. David E. ALSPACH, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Rimar Manufacturing, Inc.; Jacques H. Geisenberger, Jr.; Marvin Krasny; Adelman & Lavine; Adelman, Lavine, Krasny, Gold & Levin; and Rimar Manufacturing, Inc. v. Paul R. ROSEN; Spector, Cohen, Hunt & Rosen, P.C.; Spector, Cohen, Gadon & Rosen; Alan S. Fellheimer; Fellheimer, Krakower & Eichen; Fellheimer, Eichen & Goodman and Robert I. Martin, Mary Nagle, James A. Shertzer, S. Enola Gochenauer, Alan Shaffer, Eugene C. Adams, George F. Wilt, Michael E. Wilt, Dan H. Shertzer, and James A. Shertzer and Daniel H. Shertzer, Executors under the Will of Elva A. Shertzer, Deceased and Rimar Manufacturing, Inc., Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided October 25, 1993.

As Amended November 9, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel H. Shertzer, Lancaster, PA, for appellants.

Jacques H. Geisenberger, Jr., Lancaster, PA, for appellee David E. Alspach, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Rimar Mfg., Inc., and Rimar Mfg., Inc.

Christopher S. Underhill, Hartman, Underhill & Brubaker, Lancaster, PA, for appellee Jacques H. Geisenberger, Jr.

H. Robert Fiebach, Jeffrey S. Saltz, and Eric A. Packel, Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen, Philadelphia, PA, for appellees Marvin Krasny, Adelman & Lavine, and Adelman, Lavine, Krasny, Gold & Levin.

Before: GREENBERG, NYGAARD and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.


Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6) June 10, 1993.

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff-shareholders of Rimar Manufacturing, Inc. filed derivative claims for negligence and legal malpractice against Rimar, Rimar's bankruptcy trustee and his attorneys. They contended that the trustee and his counsel had negligently failed to file a lawsuit on behalf of Rimar within the time permitted by the statute of limitations. The district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases