Charles Lee Graham (plaintiff) appeals after the trial court, sitting as fact finder, concluded that the machine which caused injury to plaintiff was not a "power press" within the meaning of Labor Code section 4558.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
GRAHAM v. HOPKINS
13 Cal.App.4th 1483 (1993)
17 Cal. Rptr.2d 82
CHARLES LEE GRAHAM, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ROBERT HOPKINS, Defendant and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 3, 1993.
March 3, 1993.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Brigham & Gaustad and Thomas S. Brigham for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Krimen & Bjornsen and Joshua L. Bright for Defendant and Respondent.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.