U.S. v. RICH

No. 92-8230.

992 F.2d 502 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William Robert RICH, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 21, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Blankinship, Asst. U.S. Atty., Austin, TX, and Richard L. Durbin, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, TX, and Ronald F. Ederer, U.S. Atty., Austin, TX, for plaintiff-appellant.

R. James George, Austin, TX (court appointed), for defendant-appellee.

Before GOLDBERG, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.


E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

The question in this case is whether an individual's affirmative response to a police officer's request to "have a look in" the individual's automobile is the equivalent of a general consent to search the automobile and its contents, including the individual's luggage. With some reluctance, but drawing from precedent, we hold that the search does not violate the Fourth Amendment. We thus reverse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases