UNITED STATES of America
v.
Philip J. KRASNER; William P. Lozo; Stephen D. Lynch; Stanley V. Bernstein; Jeffrey N. Chudyk; Index Publishing, Ltd.; Pure Images, Inc.; Stage III, Inc.; and Graphic Distributors, Inc., Defendants.
United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 15, 1993.
July 15, 1993.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Philip J. Krasner, pro se and Paul Cambria, Lipitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Salisbury & Cambria, Buffalo, NY, for Philip J. Krasner.
William P. Lozo, pro se and Paul Cambria, Lipitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Salisbury & Cambria, Buffalo, NY and Arthur Schwartz, Bradley, Reich, and Schwartz, Denver, CO, for William P. Lozo.
Stephen D. Lynch, pro se and Paul Cambria, Lipitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Salisbury & Cambria, Buffalo, NY, and J. Michael Murray, Cleveland, OH, for Stephen D. Lynch.
Stanley V. Bernstein, pro se and H. Louis Sirkin, Sirkin, Pinales, Mezibov & Schwartz, Cincinnati, OH, for Stanley V. Bernstein.
Jeffrey N. Chudyk, pro se and Carl Max Janavitz, Pittsburgh, PA, for Jeffrey N. Chudyk.
Index Publishing, Ltd., pro se and John H. Weston, Weston, Sarno, Garrou & DeWitt, Beverly Hills, CA, for Index Pub., Ltd.
Pure Images, Inc., pro se and John H. Weston, Weston, Sarno, Garrou & DeWitt, Beverly Hills, CA, for Pure Images, Inc.
Stage III, Inc., pro se and John H. Weston, Weston, Sarno, Garrou & DeWitt, Beverly Hills, CA, for Stage III, Inc.
Graphics Distributors, Inc., pro se and John H. Weston, Weston, Sarno, Garrou & DeWitt, Beverly Hills, CA, for Graphics Distributors, Inc.
William A. Behe, U.S. Attorney's Office, Harrisburg, PA, Carl Alexandre, U.S. Dept. of Justice, and Janis Kockritz, U.S. Dept. of Justice, CEOS-Crim. Div., Washington, DC, for the U.S.
United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.
MEMORANDUM
NEALON, District Judge.
In this criminal case, predicated upon an alleged scheme to distribute obscene materials, there are several motions to dismiss the superseding indictments the United States (Government) has brought against the defendants.1 The government seeks to join the offense of money laundering to obscenity, an issue of first impression. The defendants vigorously oppose such action on a variety of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
