PER CURIAM.
In this appeal from judgment and sentence for manufacture of cannabis, possession of more than 20 grams of cannabis, and possession of paraphernalia, appellant contends he was ineffectively represented at trial. He argues that this case falls within the narrow exception to the rule that claims of ineffectiveness of counsel are collateral matters which must first be raised on motion for post-conviction relief. Stewart v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
