LANE COUNTY v. EXECUTIVE DEPT.

16-87-09905; CA A73797.

851 P.2d 633 (1993)

119 Or. App. 504

LANE COUNTY, Respondent, v. STATE of Oregon, By and Through the EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT, Defendant, and Ronald Ridings, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 21, 1993.

Reconsideration Denied August 18, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David C. Force, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief, for appellant.

David B. Williams, Asst. County Counsel, Eugene, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on the brief, was Lane County Office of Legal Counsel, Eugene.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and DE MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals a judgment, following a trial to the court, dismissing his counterclaims against Lane County. He maintains that the county's policy of selecting sergeants exclusively from employees within a bargaining unit represented by the Lane County Peace Officers' Association violates Article I, section 20, of the Oregon Constitution.1

An Article I, section 20, challenge will succeed if the party asserting the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases