MILLER v. COLUMBIA RIVER GORGE COM'N

Nos. C91-0166-W-G-12; CA A74128.

848 P.2d 629 (1993)

118 Or. App. 553

Richard and Roberta MILLER, Petitioners, v. COLUMBIA RIVER GORGE COMMISSION, Respondent, and Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Intervenor.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 17, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Smith, Tigard, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioners.

Lawrence Watters, White Salmon, Washington, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Michael D. Reynolds, Asst. Sol. Gen., Salem.

Gary K. Kahn, Portland, argued the cause for intervenor. With him on the brief was Reeves, Kahn & Eder, Portland.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


WARREN, Presiding Judge.

Petitioners seek review of the Columbia River Gorge Commission's denial of their application to divide a parcel of property and to construct a residence on the newly created portion. See 16 USC § 544 et seq; ORS ch 196. We affirm.

In their first assignment, petitioners challenge the Commission's decision on its merits. There was substantial evidence to support the Commission's decision and it properly applied the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases