1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 827 F.Supp.
  5. 827 F.Supp. 646 (1993)
 

ROSE CITY PAPER BOX v. EGENOLF GRAPHIC MACH.

Civ. No. 92-1061-FR.

827 F.Supp. 646 (1993)

ROSE CITY PAPER BOX, INC., an Oregon corporation, Plaintiff, v. EGENOLF GRAPHIC MACHINE INTERNATIONAL, INC., an Indiana corporation; Paul Egenolf & Associates, Inc., an Indiana corporation; and Paul Egenolf, individually, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

August 4, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nancy S. Tauman, Nelson L. Walker, E. Anderson Daniel, Hibbard, Caldwell & Schultz, Oregon City, OR, for plaintiff.

Michael R. Seidl, Janet L. Atwill, Bullivant, Houser, Bailey, Pendergrass & Hoffman, Portland, OR, for defendants.

OPINION

FRYE, District Judge:

The matter before the court is the motion of defendants for summary judgment (# 45).

UNDISPUTED FACTS1

This action arises out of the sale of a printing press, rebuilt and sold by defendants, Egenolf Graphic Machine, Paul Egenolf & Associates, Inc., and Paul Egenolf (collectively, Egenolf) to plaintiff, Rose City Paper Box, Inc. (Rose City).

On October 30, 1987...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases