1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 995 F.2d
  5. 995 F.2d 474 (1993)
 

ELLICOTT MACH. CORP. v. JOHN HOLLAND PARTY LTD.

No. 92-1522.

995 F.2d 474 (1993)

ELLICOTT MACHINE CORPORATION, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOHN HOLLAND PARTY LIMITED, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided May 20, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Peter Spyros Sarbanes, Venable, Baetjer & Howard, Baltimore, MD, argued (George F. Pappas, on brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

Francis Joseph Gorman, Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, Baltimore, MD, argued, for defendant-appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge:

We review the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, which dismissed a United States corporation's declaratory judgment action against an Australian construction and engineering company, John Holland Pty Ltd. ("Holland"). The court ruled that due process constraints barred it from exercising personal jurisdiction over Holland under Maryland's long-arm statute. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases