1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 814 F.Supp.
  5. 814 F.Supp. 646 (1993)
 

DAY v. NLO, INC.

No. C-1-90-67.

814 F.Supp. 646 (1993)

David DAY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NLO, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D.

January 11, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Joseph Kircher, Kircher, Robinson, Cook, Newman & Welch, Paul M. De Marco, Allen Paul Grunes, Waite, Schneider, Bayless & Chesley Co, Cincinnati, OH, for plaintiffs.

William Howard Hawkins, II, Frost & Jacobs, John Stephen Wirthlin, Sr., Kevin T. Van Wart, Beirne & Wirthlin, Cincinnati, OH, Herbert L. Fenster, McKenna, Conner & Cuneo, Washington, DC, David M. Bernick, Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, IL, for defendants.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS

SPIEGEL, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the following motions: the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 212), the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 238), the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (doc. 253), the Plaintiffs' Combined Memorandum in Opposition (doc. 301), the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (doc. 304), the Defendants' Reply (doc. 306),...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases