EGGERT v. PULEO

No. 92-1933.

67 Ohio St.3d 78 (1993)

EGGERT ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. PULEO ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 11, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hermann, Cahn & Schneider, Anthony J. Hartman and Bradford R. Carver, for appellants.

Mansour, Gavin, Gerlack & Manos Co., L.P.A., Michael T. Gavin and Eli Manos; Hendershott & Soukup Co., L.P.A., Howard E. Hendershott, Jr. and Michele A. Kisatsky, for appellees.


ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J.

R.C. Chapter 711 details the process through which a proposed subdivision is platted, approved, and developed. For purposes of this case, we are concerned primarily with provisions of that chapter which relate to the way a proposed roadway in a plat eventually becomes a public street. Two principal issues must be addressed: (1) Has Moreland Hills acquired a fee interest in the disputed parcel of land? and (2) If so, what are the consequences...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases