DE ANDA v. CITY OF LONG BEACH

No. 91-55839.

7 F.3d 1418 (1993)

Jaime De ANDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LONG BEACH, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 22, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James H. Davis, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellant.

Daniel S. Murphy, Deputy City Atty., Long Beach, CA, for defendant-appellee.

Before: FLETCHER, POOLE and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.


POOLE, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Jaime De Anda appeals the district court's adverse judgment in his civil rights action and its denial of his motion for a new trial. De Anda argues that the district court erred in (1) separating his trial into phases, (2) excluding evidence of the result of the state court preliminary hearing, and (3) limiting his examination of one of the defendants. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for a new trial.

I.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases