1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 20 Cal.App.4th
  5. 20 Cal.App.4th 1398 (1993)
 

RAYNA R. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO CTY.

Docket Nos. A061830, A061831.

20 Cal.App.4th 1398 (1993)

25 Cal. Rptr.2d 259

RAYNA R., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY, Respondent; SAN MATEO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al., Real Parties in Interest. JOSEPH R., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY, Respondent; SAN MATEO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

December 10, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Robert E. Daye and Craig R. Morey for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Thomas F. Casey, County Counsel, Beth Labson Freeman, Deputy County Counsel, and Robert L. Walker for Real Parties in Interest.

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

OPINION

CHIN, J.

In 1988 the Legislature established that a petition for an extraordinary writ, not an appeal, is the proper vehicle for immediately challenging a decision to institute proceedings to terminate parental rights made at a juvenile court permanency planning hearing. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.25, subd. (j), added by Stats. 1988...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases