1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 618 So.2d
  5. 618 So.2d 784 (1993)
 

CATOE v. STATE

No. 92-1573.

618 So.2d 784 (1993)

Michael Lewis CATOE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

May 21, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Susan A. Fagan, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nancy Ryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

COBB, Judge.

On appeal, the defendant argues that he should not have been required to pay restitution to the victim's family. We agree.

Section 775.089(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1991) states:

(c) The term "victim" as used in this section and in any provision of law relating to restitution includes the aggrieved party, the aggrieved party's estate if the aggrieved party is deceased, and the aggrieved party's next of kin if the aggrieved party is deceased...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases