1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 11 F.3d
  5. 11 F.3d 1385 (1993)
 

U.S. v. FARLEY

No. 93-1759.

11 F.3d 1385 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William F. FARLEY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided December 15, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred Foreman, U.S. Atty., Crim. Div., Catherine R. Fuller, F.T.C., Chicago, IL, James W. Lowe, Dept. of Justice Antitrust Div., Appellate Section, (argued), John W. Clark, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Reid B. Horwitz, Robert N. Cook, Ernest A. Nagata, Morris A. Bloom, F.T.C., Robert B. Nicholson, Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for U.S.

Lee A. Watson, Donald E. Egan (argued), Jaye Quadrozzi, Katten, Muchin & Zavis, Chicago, IL, for William F. Farley.

Before POSNER, Chief Judge, and CUMMINGS and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges.

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.

In January 1992 the United States filed a complaint alleging that William F. Farley violated Section 7A of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18a, commonly called the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act ("HSR Act"). The complaint alleges that on March 24, 1988, Farley failed to notify the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") when his purchases of the stock of West Point-Pepperell, Inc. ("West Point") exceeded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases