ORDER
PER CURIAM.
We find Defendant is not entitled to plain error review of issues not raised in his Rule 24.035 motion. Further, we find no error of law appears and the findings of fact issued by the motion court in overruling Defendant's 24.035 motion were not clearly erroneous.
An opinion in this case would serve no precedential purpose; therefore, we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
