GARDEN STATE BROADCASTING LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. F.C.C.

Nos. 91-1043, 91-1599, 92-1065 and 92-1388.

996 F.2d 386 (1993)

GARDEN STATE BROADCASTING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellant, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee, Pinelands, Inc., Intervenor. WHITELY COMMUNICATIONS, Appellant, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee, Pinelands, Inc., Intervenor. GARDEN STATE BROADCASTING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellant, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee, Pinelands, Inc., Intervenor. GARDEN STATE BROADCASTING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellant, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee, BHC Communications, Inc., Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing Denied September 10, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On brief were John J. Schauble and John K. Cooper for the appellant in Nos. 91-1043, 92-1065 and 92-1388. Lewis I. Cohen and Roy W. Boyce also entered appearances.

William L. Whitely entered an appearance for the appellant in No. 91-1599.

On brief were Renee Licht, Acting Gen. Counsel, Daniel M. Armstrong, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Sue Ann Kanter, Counsel, F.C.C., for the appellee in all cases.

On brief were J. Roger Wollenberg, Joel Rosenbloom and William R. Richardson, Jr., for the intervenors in all cases.

Before BUCKLEY, D.H. GINSBURG and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.


Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied September 10, 1993.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON.

KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:

Garden State Broadcasting Limited Partnership (Garden State) appeals to this court three separate, but related, orders of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the Commission). In its first appeal, Garden State challenges the Commission's dismissal of its application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases