A.L. WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. STELK

Nos. 89-8765, 90-8855.

984 F.2d 391 (1993)

A.L. WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES; Massachusetts Indemnity and Life Insurance Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Counter-Defendants, v. Randy STELK; Timothy Hunter; Willard H. Colson, Jr., d/b/a Mid-American Investors, Defendants-Appellants, Counter-Claimants, Investors Life Insurance Company of Nebraska, Defendant, Amerishare Investors, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. A.L. WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES, INC., Massachusetts Indemnity and Life Insurance Company, Plaintiffs, Counter-Defendants, Appellees, v. Randy STELK, Timothy Hunter, Defendants, Counter-Claimants, Appellants, Willard H. Colson, Jr., d/b/a Mid-American Investors, Defendant, Counter-Claimant, Appellant, Investors Life Insurance Company of Nebraska, Defendant, Counter-Defendant, Amerishare Investors, Inc., Defendant, Counter-Defendant, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

February 8, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irwin W. Stolz, Jr., Seaton D. Purdom, Atlanta, GA, for Colsons.

C.B. Rogers, Rogers & Hardin, Phillip S. McKinney, Peter W. Schneider, Atlanta, GA, for Stelk, Hunter and Amerishare.

Sidney O. Smith, Jr., Oscar N. Persons, Anne S. Rampacek, Alston & Bird, Atlanta, GA, for appellee in No. 89-8765.

Jeffrey W. Kelley, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Atlanta, GA, for Investor Life Ins. Co.

James D. Meadows, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Atlanta, GA, amicus curiae.

Seaton D. Purdom, Gambrell, Clarke, Anderson & Stolz, Irwin Stolz, C.B. Rogers, Rogers & Hardin, Phillip S. McKinney, Peter W. Schneider, Atlanta, GA, for appellant in No. 90-8855.

Sidney O. Smith, Jr., Anne S. Rampacek, Oscar N. Persons, Alston & Bird, Jeffrey W. Kelley, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Atlanta, GA, for appellees in No. 90-8855.

Before COX and DUBINA, Circuit Judges, and GODBOLD, Senior Circuit Judge.


BY THE COURT:

Appellants' and appellees' joint motion to dismiss the appeal and to vacate the May 18, 1992 (and January 14, 1993) opinions is GRANTED. The May 18, 1992 panel opinion, published at 960 F.2d 942 (11th Cir. 1992), and the January 14, 1993 (slip. page 784) opinions are VACATED. The judgment of the district court is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the district court with instruction that the case be dismissed. United...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases