HATHAWAY v. HEALTH FUTURE ENTERPRISES

WCB 90-21435; CA A72995.

865 P.2d 503 (1993)

125 Or. App. 549

In the Matter of the Compensation of Joan E. Hathaway, Claimant. Joan E. HATHAWAY, Petitioner, v. HEALTH FUTURE ENTERPRISES and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 29, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen M. Werner, Cheshire, argued the cause, for petitioner. With her on the brief were J. David Kryger and Emmons, Kropp, Kryger, Alexander, Egan & Allen, Albany.

Steve Cotton, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


WARREN, Presiding Judge.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order holding that the Board did not have jurisdiction to determine whether claimant's proposed palliative chiropractic treatment is compensable. We affirm.

After claimant became medically stationary and her claim was closed, her attending physician sought approval from employer's insurer, SAIF, for proposed palliative chiropractic treatment, pursuant to ORS 656.-245(1)(b). That...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases