STATE v. LATHROP

92CR0929FE; CA A78379.

865 P.2d 502 (1993)

125 Or. App. 544

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Michael Charles LATHROP, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 22, 1993.

Reconsideration Denied February 9, 1994.

Review Denied March 1, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew D. Johnson, argued the cause, for appellant. On the brief was Darryl E. Johnson, P.C.

Ann F. Kelley, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Amanda Buttress, Certified Law Student.

Before DEITS, P.J., RICHARDSON, C.J., and DURHAM, J.


PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of his car. His sole argument is that the search was unlawful because the officer exceeded the permissible scope of the traffic stop by asking for consent to search. The trial court found that before the officer asked defendant for consent to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases