dePARRIE v. KEISLING

SC S40633; S40609.

862 P.2d 494 (1993)

318 Or. 62

Paul dePARRIE, Petitioner, v. Phil KEISLING, Secretary of State, State of Oregon, Respondent. Henry KANE, Petitioner, v. Phil KEISLING, Secretary of State, State of Oregon, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided November 26, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul deParrie, petitioner pro se, argued the cause and filed a petition.

Henry Kane, petitioner pro se, argued the cause and filed a petition.

Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the answering memoranda were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. General, Salem.


PETERSON, Justice.

Oregon's initiative law requires that a ballot title be prepared for all statewide initiative measures. On statewide measures, the Attorney General must prepare the ballot title before signatures on initiative petitions may be collected. ORS 250.065 and 250.067. Persons who have voiced objections to the Secretary of State and remain dissatisfied with a ballot title certified by the Attorney General may...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases