1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 863 P.2d
  5. 863 P.2d 486 (1993)
 

CUSICK v. MEYER

A8601-00306; CA A70470.

863 P.2d 486 (1993)

124 Or. App. 515

G. Michael CUSICK and Christine B. Cusick, husband and wife, Appellants, v. Joe K. MEYER and Jane Fisher Meyer, husband and wife, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 17, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen T. Janik argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were David A. Urman and Ball, Janik & Novack, Portland.

Wade Regier argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Gary M. Bullock and Bullock & Regier, Portland.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and DE MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.

ROSSMAN, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendants after trial of plaintiffs' statutory ejectment claim. This is the second time that this matter has come before us. In our first opinion, Cusick v. Meyer, 98 Or.App. 358, 359, 779 P.2d 198 (1989), we held that the trial court had erred in granting summary judgment to plaintiffs and in awarding them attorney fees....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases