STATE v. HINDMAN

92-1001, 89-1203; CA A74297 (Control), CA A76192.

866 P.2d 481 (1993)

125 Or. App. 434

STATE of Oregon, Appellant, v. Jeffrey Wayne HINDMAN, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 22, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Janet A. Metcalf, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Steven L. Price, Hillsboro, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and DURHAM, JJ.


DEITS, Presiding Judge.

The state appeals from two orders suppressing evidence seized during a search conducted pursuant to a condition of defendant's probation.

In 1989, defendant was indicted for possession and manufacture of a controlled substance (marijuana). ORS 475.992. As part of a plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to possession, and the state dismissed the manufacturing charge. The state and defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases