PURDY v. CITY OF YORK

No. S-91-059.

500 N.W.2d 841 (1993)

243 Neb. 593

Shirley A. PURDY and Anita Pearson, Appellees, v. CITY OF YORK, Nebraska, A Municipal Corporation, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Nebraska.

June 11, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vincent Valentino, of Angle, Murphy, Valentino & Campbell, P.C., York, for appellant.

John R. Brogan, York, for appellees.

Richard J. Pedersen and Carol C. Knoepfler, of Baird, Holm, McEachen, Pedersen, Hamann & Strasheim, Omaha, for amicus curiae League of Nebraska Municipalities.

HASTINGS, C.J., and BOSLAUGH, WHITE, SHANAHAN, FAHRNBRUCH, and LANPHIER, JJ.


LANPHIER, Justice.

The defendant, the City of York, Nebraska (City), appeals from a judgment of the district court for York County vacating and setting aside a special assessment levied against the property of the plaintiffs, Shirley A. Purdy and Anita Pearson, for the construction of water extension district No. 88-2. The district court found that the ordinance creating water extension district No. 88-2 was null and void because the City failed to comply with the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases