1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 636 N.E.2d
  5. 636 N.E.2d 704 (1993)
 

CITY OF CHICAGO v. COMMERCE COMM'N

No. 1-92-1397.

636 N.E.2d 704 (1993)

264 Ill. App.3d 403

201 Ill.Dec. 272

CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION and Commonwealth Edison Company, Respondents-Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Sixth Division.

September 17, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kelly R. Welsh, Corp. Counsel of the City of Chicago, Chicago (Lawrence Rosenthal and Conrad Reddick, Deputy Corp. Counsel and Alan Neff, Asst. Corp. Counsel, of counsel), for petitioner-appellant.

G. Darryl Reed, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Chicago, for respondent-appellee Illinois Commerce Com'n.

Hopkins and Sutter, Chicago (Paul F. Hanzlik and Bryan S. Anderson, of counsel) and Kevin M. Forde, Ltd. (Kevin M. Forde, of counsel), for respondent-appellee Commonwealth Edison.

Justice GIANNIS delivered the opinion of the court:

The City of Chicago (City) appeals from an order of the Illinois Commerce Commission (Commission) approving with modification Commonwealth Edison Company's (Edison) proposed Rider 28—Local Government Compliance Clause. In general, Rider 28 directs Edison to recover the marginal costs of providing "non-standard" service from customers within any governmental unit that mandates such service. Currently any additional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases