FETTIG v. KAILES

D9006-65217; CA A71038.

863 P.2d 476 (1993)

124 Or. App. 455

Misty A. FETTIG, Respondent, and Albert Joseph KAILES, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 17, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ira L. Gottlieb, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Lawrence D. Gorin and Keller, Gottlieb & Gorin.

Charles D. Gazzola argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Stahancyk, Gazzola & Gearing.

Before RICHARDSON, C.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.

Father seeks modification of an order requiring him to pay $900 per month child support. He contends that the trial court erred in calculating mother's income and in not further reducing the presumptive support obligation under the Uniform Child Support Guidelines. OAR 137-50-320 to OAR 137-50-490. Because the trial court erred in calculating mother's income, we reverse and remand for recalculation of support.

Father and mother were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases