BALL v. MELSUR CORP.

No. 92-487.

633 A.2d 705 (1993)

Albert L. BALL & Jeanette Ball v. MELSUR CORPORATION.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

September 24, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick deG. Harlow and Martha Anne Wieler of Harlow Liccardi & Crawford, P.C., Rutland, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Sheilla C. Files and Douglas Richards of Richards & Files, P.C., Springfield, for defendant-appellant.

Before ALLEN, C.J., GIBSON and JOHNSON, JJ., and PECK, J. (Ret.), Specially Assigned.


ALLEN, Chief Justice.

Defendant Melsur Corporation appeals an adverse judgment in a personal injury case and seeks a new trial. Defendant claims that: (1) the administrative judge for the trial courts committed reversible error when he denied defendant's motion for recusal; (2) the trial court committed reversible error when it allowed plaintiffs to present evidence of certain OSHA/VOSHA standards and their alleged violation; (3) the jury verdict was a result of passion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases