STATE v. FLAG-REDFERN OIL CO.

Nos. D-0872, D-0874.

852 S.W.2d 480 (1993)

The STATE of Texas and the General Land Office of the State of Texas, Petitioners, v. FLAG-REDFERN OIL COMPANY, Respondent. The STATE of Texas, the General Land Office of the State of Texas, and Garry Mauro, Petitioners, v. RUTHERFORD OIL CORPORATION, Conoco, Inc., and Ladd Petroleum Corporation, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Concurring Opinion filed March 3, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jose Manuel Rangel, Liz Bills, Priscilla M. Hubenak, Dan Morales, Will Pryor, Mary F. Keller, and Ed Salazar, Austin, for petitioners.

P.M. Schenkkan, David B. McCall, Tom C. McCall, Stephen B. O'Connell, Elizabeth M. Marsh, Patrick F. Thompson, Mary Barrow Nichols and Eva C. Ramos, Austin, and Steven C. Kiser, Midland, for respondents.


Concurring Opinion filed by Justice Gonzalez March 3, 1993.

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

SPECTOR, Justice.

The Respondents' motion for rehearing is overruled. The court's opinion of March 3, 1993 is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor.

These two causes were submitted together because both involve the authority of the Texas General Land Office to determine contract rights under state mineral leases.1<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases