STATE v. LAJOIE

CC 10-88-08977; CA A63706; SC S37935.

849 P.2d 479 (1993)

316 Or. 63

STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Clinton Keith LAJOIE, Petitioner on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Reassigned April 7, 1993.

Decided April 15, 1993.

Reconsideration Denied May 25, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael V. Phillips, of Johnson, Clifton, Larson & Bolin, P.C., Eugene, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Jas. Adams, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the response brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.


GILLETTE, Justice.

At issue in this case is whether an accused's failure to give statutorily mandated notice of his intention to offer evidence of the alleged victim's past sexual behavior requires a trial court to refuse to allow the accused to present such evidence at trial and, if it does, whether such a requirement is constitutional. Under the specific facts presented here, we hold that such a failure does so require...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases