TIPTON v. HEEREN

Nos. 22916, 23184.

859 P.2d 465 (1993)

Lee G. TIPTON, Appellant, v. Paul HEEREN and Carol Heeren, Respondents (Two Cases).

Supreme Court of Nevada.

September 23, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morton & Associates, Las Vegas, for appellant.

Jimmerson, Davis & Santoro, and Lynn M. Hansen, Las Vegas, for respondents.


OPINION

YOUNG, Justice:

The appeal in Case No. 22916 concerns whether appellant Lee Tipton ("Tipton") was a holder in due course ("HDC") of a $60,800 unsecured promissory note (the "Note") made payable to Applied Genetic International, Inc. ("AGI") by respondents Paul and Carol Heeren ("Heerens") for the purchase of a cow. The district court ruled for Heerens, finding that Tipton did not constitute an HDC. As a result, the district court subjected...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases