DISCIPLINARY ACTION
PER CURIAM.
Daniel DeArmond, the Respondent in this case, was charged in a four count complaint for disciplinary action with, among other matters, committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on his fitness as a lawyer. On February 10, 1993, pursuant to the Hearing Officer's recommendation, this Court suspended the Respondent pending final determination of this case. After a hearing on the merits of the complaint, the Hearing Officer...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.