WENZEL v. ENRIGHT

No. 92-2115.

68 Ohio St.3d 63 (1993)

WENZEL, APPELLANT, v. ENRIGHT, CLERK, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 22, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tyack & Blackmore Co., L.P.A., and Thomas M. Tyack, for appellant.

Michael Miller, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and James V. Canepa, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.


DOUGLAS, J.

Appellant suggests that habeas corpus is a proper remedy for an accused seeking pretrial appellate review of a trial court's decision denying a motion to dismiss on the ground of double jeopardy. We disagree. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

In Owens v. Campbell (1971), 27 Ohio St.2d 264, 56...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases